Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 11th Jan 2006 18:06 UTC
Red Hat Red Hat is letting Novell's Mono software only into its noncommercial Fedora product line, the Linux seller said Tuesday. Red Hat has no plans at this time to include the Novell software in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, company spokeswoman Gillian Farquhar said, meaning that there are no plans right now to make it a standard part of the commercially supported product from the Linux leader.
Thread beginning with comment 84685
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Mono is useful on Linux
by Mystilleef on Wed 11th Jan 2006 19:32 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Mono is useful on Linux"
Mystilleef
Member since:
2005-06-29

Isn't Python already part of GNOME? My experience with Mono and Mono applications has not been rosey. I don't think Mono is as stable as Python for desktop application development. But perhaps my experience is skewed.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Mono is useful on Linux
by Eugenia on Wed 11th Jan 2006 19:40 in reply to "RE[3]: Mono is useful on Linux"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

>Isn't Python already part of GNOME?

It is part of the bindings platform, not directly into the core Gnome. Many OSes/distros don't ship with pyGTK by default, even if they might use Gnome.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

thebluesgnr Member since:
2005-11-14

Pygtk is a dependency of the GNOME desktop already.

(gnome-menus depends on pygtk, and gnome-panel on gnome-menus).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Mono is useful on Linux
by buff on Wed 11th Jan 2006 19:50 in reply to "RE[3]: Mono is useful on Linux"
buff Member since:
2005-11-12

You are right there is some instability in Mono. Python is more mature. Python is a good choice for small desktop applications but C# and Java are better for larger, more complicated applications.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Mystilleef Member since:
2005-06-29

I've heard a lot of people say that, but nobody seems to back the statement up? Why is Python inelligible for large scale software development?

All three languages are VM based. All three languages supported garbage collection. All three languages support OO paradigms, supposedly good for large scale development. Python goes even one step further by being multi-paradigm and liberal.

The only major difference between Python and the other VM based languages you mentioned is that Python is dynamically typed. And many developers even consider this to be a productivity boost or advantage over Java or Mono(C#).

So what makes Java/Mono better than Python for larger, more complicated applications? Is this a conclusion reached based on your experience?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1