Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jan 2006 18:45 UTC
Apple Apple's Steve Jobs has announced several new products today during his keynote at MacWorld (photos). After the usual chit-chat about the success of the retail stores and iTunes, Jobs got to the meat of the matter. He announced an FM-tuner with remote-control for the Nano/Video iPod. Read more for the really interesting stuff!
Thread beginning with comment 84687
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Pentium vs PowerPC
by TomB7 on Wed 11th Jan 2006 19:35 UTC in reply to "RE: Pentium vs PowerPC"
TomB7
Member since:
2006-01-03

The lagging clock speed was the killer; you can only make up for so much by using RISC.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Pentium vs PowerPC
by rayiner on Wed 11th Jan 2006 21:38 in reply to "RE[2]: Pentium vs PowerPC"
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

You don't make up much at all by using RISC. That's the basic fallacy that people have to get over. You save a little bit of die space, a few stages in the pipeline, and allow some better register allocation. On the other hand, your code density takes a dive, along with your i-cache hit rate.

The performance differences between the Gx and x86 chips aren't due to RISC vs CISC. The G4's FPU performance is bad not because its RISC, but because it's got a single FPU pipeline. The G5's integer performance isn't bad because its RISC, but because its got a long pipeline, only two integer units, and two-cycle latency for simple instructions. Conversely, the G5's floating-point performance isn't great because its RISC, but beceause its got two symmetric FPU pipes each of which are capable of a multiply-add per cycle.

In the end, it comes down to the design of the CPU. PowerPC vs x86 is irrelevent.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2