Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jul 2005 14:57 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 8482
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
> Those PBI's makes PC-BSD usefull and atractive for a
> broader audience,without sacrificing any of FreeBSD's
> strength:-)
Maybe they do, BUT:
- they have nothing to do with BSD; it's actually very easy to link Linux or Solaris apps statically against zlib, put them into an archive (deb, rpm, tar, whatever) together with a copy of libpng and jpeglib and call this an "innovation" that "resolves dependencies" (actually, every software for Microsoft Windows has been packaged like this for years)
- they are very convenient at install time just like the famous user-friendly Microsoft Windows SETUP.EXE, but they are very inconvenient and hard to maintain later because they need to be checked, patched, installed over and over again in the case of a library security leak or any other sort of bug
Therefore: Yes, these PBIs are exactly what makes PC-BSD so useful and attractive, and they are exactly what people who don't understand UNIX deserve.