Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Jan 2006 22:08 UTC, submitted by Peter Leese
Thread beginning with comment 86529
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Bugzilla is already capability of using XML-RPC to interoperate between already open source bug tracking systems which is almost always bugzilla. I dont understand ubuntu's decision here at all."
https://wiki.launchpad.canonical.com/WhatIsTheLaunchpad
after reading about launchpad a little, you'll understand that it is not just about shared bug tracking. it is about increasing productivity by making it easier for more people to contribute in a managed fashion. this includes the ability to branch code (bazaar-ng), translate into native languages (rosetta), and track patches, branches, and bugs across multiple distros (malone). bugzilla is great for bug tracking, but launchpad is something much more.




Member since:
2005-12-18
"I think there is value in having a central point of focus and direction, which can act as a broad funnel that is accommodating and accessible to many users."
Bugzilla is already capability of using XML-RPC to interoperate between already open source bug tracking systems which is almost always bugzilla. I dont understand ubuntu's decision here at all.