To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, what reasons have MS given in the past about the reason they don't release source code and the reason they limit who has access to the source code of say, Windows?
I don't know and apparently you don't either. Got any sources where you've actually heard that's why? No? Then don't say it.
I think that MS took it down to impede vulns. Maybe it's FUD, maybe it's not.
(vulns = vulnerabilities)
Um, I'm assuming they took it down because it wasn't supposed to be up? There is nothing more to it. Anything not meant to be released is always requested to be taken down by MS. That's how corporations and most companies work, and it's fair.
You're making assumptions here and it's ridiculous because you're offering nothing behind it.




Member since:
2005-10-18
Well, what reasons have MS given in the past about the reason they don't release source code and the reason they limit who has access to the source code of say, Windows?
Fear of exploits and vulns is the only reason that I've ever heard. If you know some other reasons, enlighten me
I'm not talking about any specific vulns, just speculating, if you noticed, MS didn't politely ask to take the content off, it WENT OFF, as fast as possible too. I didn't even get a look at it, not even screenshots, unless I was going to the wrong site. The only link up there is just a news article about the site being taken down. I think that MS took it down to impede vulns. Maybe it's FUD, maybe it's not.
(vulns = vulnerabilities)
--ZaNkY