Linked by Andrew Youll on Sun 24th Jul 2005 21:03 UTC, submitted by phaceton
Thread beginning with comment 8954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Some people use their computers more than others. The way I use the computer, I benefit from a lot of memory.
In the end-user performance testing I've done, you get a big pay off when you get to about 900MB memory for the modern OS (1GB in round numbers). There is another pay off around 1.5-1.7GB and then things taper off.
So I've got 2GB of each of my workstations and 3GB on the server as I burn over 2GB of memory with virtual machines.
Even if you just open a few large Photoshop images, having at least 1GB is a big time saver. I could not imagine using a computer, any OS, with 512MB of RAM. That is like buying a Ferrari and limiting the speed to 25mph. What a waste.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I've got 2GB for Linux, 2GB for XP, and 3GB for Windows 2000. The mini at 1GB is a bit slower and swaps more often. The processor lags a bit compared to Intel as well.
I do audio work on my computers (Tracktion, Reason, Sound Forge) and I have 768MB on my laptop (XP) and 1gig on my desktop (XP)
I disagree with the modern OS's needing 2gig. That's ridiculous.