Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Jan 2006 18:04 UTC, submitted by Nehemoth
Some more news on Apple's Intel Macs. First off, contrary to what OSNews reported on 
Thread beginning with comment 89766
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-14
Member since:2005-11-10
Member since:2005-07-09
Member since:2005-07-06
"Anybody who can't understand this needs to get a job and realise that they are not the majority."
I've got a job. I work in Windows all day, except for a Linux server that I use for ad-hoc tasks. And I'll be damned if I'm going to shell out $$$ for a computer to use for work when they provide me with one. Most people's employers supply them with a PC (probably a Wintel box), so I find the argument that "oh, I've got to do work stuff in windows, but I want to live in OSX" to be a bit... What's the word? Stupid? yeah. That's it.
You sir, are not in the majority either. Most people will simply use the computer that their company provides them, which is a wintel box. Not run out an buy a computer themselves to use for work.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-10
I suppose this thread will be dedicated to the "Why would you want to boot Windows on a Mac when you can build your own machine for $3". Some people *have* to work on Windows, no alternative, no use linux, no choice.
Being able to use OSX for day to day things and Windows for work where it's needed, far exceeds the want to run two machines.
Anybody who can't understand this needs to get a job and realise that they are not the majority.