To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
First of all, it's impossible to get a perfect consensus without any form of compromise. Unless the FSF and the Linux developers are open at making some, it won't happen. There is the option of rewriting GPLv2 code, but this would be counter-productive. It would probably hinder the momentum that Linux got. Given that the GNU OS is usually combined with the Linux kernel, it might have an impact on their goals.
People should just live with the fact that Linux is not GNU. It's not like GPLv2 is completely useless, either. If you cannot accept this, just use the alternatives...
Sometimes, I wish Linus & co started the development or the porting of another userland to prove their kernel is not "just another dumb piece in the puzzle that is easily replacable".




Member since:
2006-01-03
Realistically yes. Unless you want to replace eveything Linus has ever committed to the kernel. No? I thought not. To get the kernel to v3 (which there is zero reason to do anyway) you have to do 1 of 2 things:
#1 Get everyone still living to agree to it.
#2 Re-write everything that those against moving to the v3 version committed to the kernel.
I see neither of those happening.
Then you have the politics aspect of going against Linus the kernel guy himself. Oi! I don't see that happening with any kind of success what-so-ever.