Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jan 2006 16:46 UTC, submitted by Dually
Thread beginning with comment 90416
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-14
So, no mention in the story headline of the fact that the new dual core chip still lasts longer on the battery than the old one?
The new dual core chips have more power saving options, its not really suprising in an early release that the O/S won't fully understand them all. One way to save power is to shut down one core completely. I'm guessing the bug prevents that for some reason and it'll probably take some reworking under the hood of the O/S to fix it, which is why it's still around even after being reported such a long time ago.
--
Phillip Fayers http://phillipfayers.blogspot.com/