Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Feb 2006 19:49 UTC
"AMD has been a leader in getting 64-bit technology off the PowerPoint and into servers, desktops, and wherever else they can put it and has a clear-cut technology advantage over most of the current crop of Intel processors. For a company that likes to 'Think Different', Apple chose a conservative path in selecting Intel processors to power its latest generation of computers." In related news, our favourite 
Thread beginning with comment 92014
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
What I'm saying is this. Whether ittruly is a monopoly or not is immaterial; the fact that it's perceived as one cripples Microsoft's abilities to compete in certain aspects.
Yep, and that's why the DoJ ever bothered with the anti-trust suit.
Even though it was too late to do anything about the outcome of the browser wars, at least it put MS on notice for the future. And arguably it saved Apple, because the agreement where MS invested in Apple and committed to Mac Office only came about because MS needed Apple as a plausible competitor in the anti-trust case.