Linked by on Wed 1st Feb 2006 19:53 UTC
Novell and Ximian A demonstration of the next release of Novell's Linux for desktops drew cheers and applause Wednesday, although the final version of the software is not expected for some months. Nat Friedman, the company's vice president of Linux desktop engineering, showed Novell Linux Desktop 10 playing videos and MP3 music files, and exchanging music and photos with an iPod and a digital camera, in a keynote presentation at the Solutions Linux conference and trade show on the outskirts of Paris.
Thread beginning with comment 92122
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: segedenum
by Mitarai on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 19:51 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: segedenum"
Mitarai
Member since:
2005-07-28

So, you re talking as the clasic troll who saids "this application is better than that", pff, so? if the solution were installing "the best app", GNOME and KDE wouln't have any place in the enterprice.

And there is a small datail called Qt dual license that would force your customers to buy an expensive license if they don't wan't to develope a GPL application?

of course, your vision has been always short, like the troll you are.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[7]: segedenum
by superstoned on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:02 in reply to "RE[6]: segedenum"
superstoned Member since:
2005-07-07

i said if they don't distribute (i said sell) their app, they can develop it for free, they don't have to pay. so for internal usage, Qt is as free as GTK. and if you want to sell your software as proprietary software (and you shouldn't), you can pay them for a license. you can pay them if you don't sell your software, too, so you get tech support, btw (and some companies acutally DO).

get your facts straight before calling someone a troll, thank you.

and you're right about the 'this app is better than that app', i shouldn't have said it. still YOU ignore the other valid comments!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: segedenum
by Mitarai on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:04 in reply to "RE[7]: segedenum"
Mitarai Member since:
2005-07-28

i said if they don't distribute (i said sell) their app, they can develop it for free, they don't have to pay.

But what if they need to? they have to pay of course.

The same arguments over an over gain.

and you're right about the 'this app is better than that app', i shouldn't have said it. still YOU ignore the other valid comments!

There were any other valid comments i must say.

Reply Parent Score: 1