Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 21:26 UTC, submitted by Anonymous
Novell and Ximian LinuxEdge has posted the videos of the presentation of Novell Desktop Linux 10 by Nat Friedman. "A preview of Novell Linux Desktop 10 was shown to an audience at the Solutions Linux conference this week. We have a selection of videos which display a variety of amazing effects through the use of XGL, including transparency, wobbling windows, a 3D cube for desktop switching, and a task switcher which displays a preview of windows."
Thread beginning with comment 92476
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
tristan
Member since:
2006-02-01

I think that's because a completely hardware accelerated desktop using 3D graphics interfaces isn't a new idea by any means. It's a sensible and logical thing to do, and has mooted for years -- I'm pretty sure the idea for XGL was around before Quarz Extreme or whatever it's called in Vista. It's just taken Novell to actually take a lead and get it developed.

If there were certain effect whereby windows appeared to grow out of the taskbar when they were unminimised, a la OS X, or the titlebars of windows appeared frosted when they were in the background, a la Vista, there might be more of a case for shouting "copycats" -- but as it stands, I don't think it's reasonable.

Besides, Gnome and KDE have been stealing the best ideas from OS X and Windows (usually, respectively) for years ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 2

Tom K Member since:
2005-07-06

This is a "preview of Novell Linux Desktop 10", meaning that it's not just a tech demo, but an actual preview of what may be in the final. I'd say it's at least somewhat reasonable to shout "copycat", seeing as how the same is done against Microsoft when there's even a slight whiff of any reimplementations of existing competitor's products.

In any case, I'd like to know where you get the idea that the idea for XGL was around before Quartz/Avalon. Do you actually have any news story or timeline to prove that?

Reply Parent Score: 1

somebody Member since:
2005-07-07

I'd say it's at least somewhat reasonable to shout "copycat", seeing as how the same is done against Microsoft when there's even a slight whiff of any reimplementations of existing competitor's products.

So shout once, ok. yes, it is expose rip off. no one denies that here, but to be fair expose is the only ripped feature here, all others pre existed OSX.

There's no need to be the only one shouting here and post zillion posts spewing the same, people will get tired of moding you down.

Apple did copy a lot from others too. As did MS. And same goes for Novell, Gnome, KDE, [insert your project here].

Reply Parent Score: 2