Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 21:26 UTC, submitted by Anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 92629
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I really don't understand some people, this is a huge step forward for Linux desktop. Would you REALLY rather still have slow jerky desktop and a total piece crap called Metacity that does basicaly nothing and is evolving at same speed as nature? Fine by me, maybe in 2031 it'll start supporting shadows, yeah baby! *drool*
I know I'd rather have my tens of millions of GPU transistors doing something rather than twiddling their thumbs.




Member since:
2005-07-06
It's funny how people were drooling over videos and screenshots of XGL and Luminocity a year ago, wanting this on their machines. Now, that we're days away from actualy having this (I hope) on our desktops...now what the hell do you want? Ran out of things to piss on?!
There is nothing new to see on these videos, yeah, but unlike last year, we can see XGL being presented by Novell, not just some video from a geek's room....and that is so bad...why?! There isn't much you can "invent", some practices, like Expose, were accepted by users as really good, also zooming (I could really use it in website development, where checking pixels) and task switching is FINALLY getting somewhere.
I really don't understand some people, this is a huge step forward for Linux desktop. Would you REALLY rather still have slow jerky desktop and a total piece crap called Metacity that does basicaly nothing and is evolving at same speed as nature? Fine by me, maybe in 2031 it'll start supporting shadows, yeah baby! *drool*
Edited 2006-02-04 11:49