To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The "crusader" label was applied by Linus Torvalds to the free software "fanatics", or "jihadists" as one poster here humorously put it. I had been expecting more commentary from the FSF and RMS upon LT's outbursts but they have been surprisingly quiet. If I remember correctly RMS said very recently that LT was entitled to do what he wanted to with his kernel, and that he did not want to engage LT in a public argument.
On the topic of the HURD, the project seems ambitious. It would be interesting to see if the availability of processors sporting more cores and faster speeds will make the microkernel design more practical in the future.
Howdy
I found the original article to be offensive, especially the remark about "crusaders." That was a very cheap shot, and tarnishes the author's argument to such an extent that even if he's right, people are going to dismiss him as a loonie.
There isn`t much in the article that I do not see as "reality challenged", next we`ll be hearing about "day walkers" or "married people" perhaps even stranger concepts in an online society.




Member since:
2006-01-07
If Stallman & friends feel so passionately about GPL v3, then they can release their own kernel (The Hurd) under it. In fact, I'm sure that they will do this. So if the "free world" thinks that GPL v3 is so important, they can migrate to The Hurd. Let's have some competition here, Linux GPL v2 vs. The Hurd GPL v3. The world will decide which is better. Info about The Hurd can be found here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html
Personally, I wouldn't bet my lunch on The Hurd, but we'll see.
It would be nice if this GPL debate could be discussed in a civilized manner. Like most of the other posters here, I found the original article to be offensive, especially the remark about "crusaders." That was a very cheap shot, and tarnishes the author's argument to such an extent that even if he's right, people are going to dismiss him as a loonie.