Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Feb 2006 19:10 UTC
SGI and IRIX SGI issued its most ominous regulatory filing to date, warning that a bad 2006 could force the former high-flyer into bankruptcy. In order to improve its business, SGI will consider measures ranging from axing or selling off product lines to pursuing 'a strategic partner or acquirer.' The hardware maker will basically look at anything and everything to remain a going concern.
Thread beginning with comment 94454
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
20-20 hindsight
by CrLf on Fri 10th Feb 2006 02:20 UTC
CrLf
Member since:
2006-01-03

Every time an SGI article pops out, there come the whiners, blabbing how SGI screwed itself by dopping MIPS/Irix and going to Linux/Itanium...

SGI screwed itself when it didn't realize that the x86 camp was eating their cake. SGI was used to selling expensive machines to the graphics folks, and then those folks found out that a pile of cheap boxes with Linux could do the same work as a pile of expensive (albeit good looking) boxes from SGI, coupled with a pile of licenses for IRIX.

SGI should have diversified their offer. They could have pushed x86 servers and workstations with the SGI brand to keep HP at bay.

They did try that Visual Workstation stunt, but that had a couple of problems: they had an x86 inside, but they were different enough to not be a PC and have big price tag. The idea was there, and it was good, but the implementation sucked.

But the real mistakes were the selling of MIPS and Alias.

MIPS had no future in servers or workstations, but it is very popular in the embedded space. They could have been designing embedded processors, and collecting royalties from every one of the millions of appliances out there (just imagine how many Linksys routers there are).

Alias, well, that seems to keep being profitable.

And they could keep selling supercomputers... But since that's their only business right now, if it fails, they're dead.

Reply Score: 2

RE: 20-20 hindsight
by stew on Fri 10th Feb 2006 09:28 in reply to "20-20 hindsight"
stew Member since:
2005-07-06

SGI should have diversified their offer. They could have pushed x86 servers and workstations with the SGI brand to keep HP at bay.

They did try that Visual Workstation stunt, but that had a couple of problems: they had an x86 inside, but they were different enough to not be a PC and have big price tag. The idea was there, and it was good, but the implementation sucked.


Yes, that might have worked. After all, Apple and Sun are doing the same: Taking off the shelf components, putting them together in a design without out 8088 backwards compatibility, put them in a pretty case and install a decent Unix. Imagine a dual Opteron with a Quadro FX card in a Tezro case running Irix ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1