Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Feb 2006 22:21 UTC, submitted by egan
Mandriva, Mandrake, Lycoris Mandriva's CEO got interviewed for the Mandriva club. "Right now, the new 'in thing' is Ubuntu. Of course, the situation is a bit different in this case: one person, with a quasi infinite check book is behind the operation. So they can give the system away and spend whatever is needed. Is this the right way for the open source eco-system? I find it hard to believe. One possible worse case scenario is that Ubuntu's plan is to use money to put all other community-based distros out of business and then start monetizing the installed base. If this were the case, they are doing the easy part: increasing their market share by giving away the product. We have found that the second part is a tad more difficult."
Thread beginning with comment 94965
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The difference in distros...
by xzgv on Sun 12th Feb 2006 15:59 UTC
xzgv
Member since:
2005-11-15

got nothing to do if they got free money or not.

I don't use RH, SuSE, or Mandriva because they are bloated and their package manager sucks big time.

I don't use Ubuntu because to me, it's bloated and slow.

I can't waste days compiling my apps in Gentoo.

Nor do i have time to configure Slack and fish for dependencies.

I use Debian Sarge with a minimal installation and IceWM; now, to me, that's a lean, fast box.

So, what does money has to do with it? It's the distro, and your needs in terms of hardware, time, and degree of tech-savvy that dictates what you use.