Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Feb 2006 15:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 95947
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Thom Distortion Field
by Tyr. on Wed 15th Feb 2006 18:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Thom Distortion Field"
In this case, is it better to let a native speaking English editor to review the title before submitting it?
Or people could just stop with the pointless Thom-bashing. That got old real quick when it was still Eugenia-bashing and has become even more annoying now.
Every damn article the same nonsense over again, just quit it already. Why don't people just mail the guy if they think they've got a real grievance ?
Edited 2006-02-15 18:38
RE[4]: Thom Distortion Field
by J-S-H on Wed 15th Feb 2006 19:08
in reply to "RE[3]: Thom Distortion Field"
RE[4]: Thom Distortion Field
by Finalzone on Wed 15th Feb 2006 23:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Thom Distortion Field"
Actually, the title is misleading. It should be titled:
Ben Goodger: Firefox 'Memory Leak' a Feature to match the actual quote from Ben. Ben Goodger: Firefox Memory Leak a 'Feature' is completely different. You can call "sensasionalism" but misquoting someone hinder the reporter.






Member since:
2005-07-06
I'm going to give Thom the benefit of the doubt and say that he didn't realize how bad that title was because English isn't his first language...
In this case, is it better to let a native speaking English editor to review the title before submitting it?