To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Microsoft has a larger monopoly on desktop operating systems than Standard Oil ever had on refinery."
To be a monopoly you have to be the only one with a service or the only one allowed to provide the service. Thats basically the definition of monopoly , which apparently you dont know and dont understand. How do you explain Apple Mac OS X , OS/2 , GNU/Linux , Pc-BSD , if its a monopoly ?
"They might not ban you from this site because they find you amusing"
Thats a good question , ask them if they feel like it they will provide you an answer.
"but in the future please refrain from replying to my comments with nonsense."
Only nonsense I see is written by "Get a Life". Btw just to make sure you get it :
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&scoring=d&ie=utf-8&...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly
According to the US Dept of Justice's Findings of Fact document, section III:
"34. Viewed together, three main facts indicate that Microsoft enjoys monopoly power. First, Microsoft's share of the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems is extremely large and stable. Second, Microsoft's dominant market share is protected by a high barrier to entry. Third, and largely as a result of that barrier, Microsoft's customers lack a commercially viable alternative to Windows."
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm#iii
Apple Mac OS X was originally developed in isolation on a completely different hardware platform. That fact protected it from Microsoft's major attacks (preloads and exclusive deals with hardware makers), and enabled it to survive to the present day. The x86 version is a port of the protected development.
OS/2 was developed on x86 by what was then the largest software company in the world (IBM), but not even IBM could sustain its presence in the market. OS/2 is now unsupported by its maker, and has been in a steady decline markersharewise for over a decade. Keep in mind that IBM also received over US$700 million in compensation for Microsoft's past activities towards OS/2 in the US.
Linux and BSD were mainly developed competely outside of the commercial software marketplace. As noncommercial software development, they are largely immune from the effects of market forces.
Why are you ignoring the facts?
From the article you linked to :
"Monopolistic competition
Main article: Monopolistic competition
Industries which are dominated by a single firm may allow the firm to act as a near-monopoly or "de facto monopoly", a practice known in economics as monopolistic competition. Common historical examples arguably include corporations such as Microsoft and Standard Oil (Standard's market share of refining was 64% in competition with over 100 other refiners at the time of the trial that resulted in the government-forced breakup). Practices which these entities may be accused of include dumping products below cost to harm competitors, creating tying arrangements between their products, and other practices regulated under antitrust law."
Somehow I don't think that was your point.





Member since:
2006-01-01
Microsoft has a larger monopoly on desktop operating systems than Standard Oil ever had on refinery. They might not ban you from this site because they find you amusing, but in the future please refrain from replying to my comments with nonsense.