To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To get an implementation certified requires intensive pedantic testing which often gets charged for.
Years back there was a Linux distro that got certified, however most of the FOSS world settles for conformance.
Leaves me wondering why NetBSD and not others. Still; I am glad they have made a start.
You don't have to get permission to implement a standard. But how will a customer know that you have implemented the standard, and done so correctly? Should they take your word for it? This allows NetBSD to not only implement the standard but to make the verifiable claim of POSIX conformance, with the verification coming from the POSIX authorities themselves.
> but to make the verifiable claim of POSIX conformance, with the verification coming from the POSIX authorities themselves.
The POSIX guys did not certified NetBSD as being POSIX compliant; they just gave the NetBSD foundation the right to include the documentation in their product.
The press release is quite unclear.






Member since:
2005-07-08
I don't understand why you've to get a permission to add support for a standard. Standards are supposed to be...standards, having to gran permission looks the same than making them closed standards and granting licenses to the people you want