To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, both reuse the current XServer. And XGL isn't a hack --- it simply uses the current X server for GL because no standalone OpenGL stack is yet available on Linux. DRI-EGL will fix that, but it'll take a while to get it working.
My two bits: AIGLX simply perpetuates the idea that any significant chanegs to X will cause the world to end. That's quite a sad attitude, really. XGL is The Right Way (TM) to handle extending X11 into an 3D accelerated world. However, it also require major changes to the driver infrastructure which, frankly, are necessary anyway. Both Microsoft and Apple have decided to bite the bullet and overhaul the GL stack so the higher level software can do the right thing, and it'd be a shame if X cut corners in this regard. It also illustrates very well the "let's extend EXA a little bit more" slippery slope that John Smirl warned about.
Edited 2006-02-20 23:29




Member since:
2006-02-20
Well, actually it's the other way round: AIGLX uses the existing pieces and implements accelerated 3D with them. (The problem lies within the drivers, which have to be adapted to this chances.)
GLX however requires a completly new xserver. In other ways; to throw away the complete Xorg codebase and start anew.
And you may know (or not): GLX still requires a host XServer. It is not a complete XServer itself. It's a hack.