Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Feb 2006 17:59 UTC
Mac OS X "[Last week], we reported on a Trojan horse for Mac OS X that is just like the entry for Earth in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy in that it is mostly harmless. A new vulnerability targeted at Apple's home-grown web browser, Safari, is another matter entirely. A German security firm appears to have been the first to discover the Safari flaw, which allows for shell scripts to be executed after clicking a link."
Thread beginning with comment 97972
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Reality strikes back
by olivier on Tue 21st Feb 2006 23:00 UTC in reply to "RE: Reality strikes back"
Member since:

Wow, didn't think my post would attract so much enthusiasm.
Anyway, I do not work for Microsoft, I work for a financial institution (hence the MSFT ticker), but that isn't relevant to my point.
I said the office machine was a 3rd "less" ; i.e. 2/3rds of the Mac price, i.e. a ~30% discount. But price is not really my concern.

As I personally don't deal with Windows security updates anymore (at home I have a Mac, and at the office patches are deployed by desktop support, I never get involved). It just seems from an outsider's point of view that windows seems to be getting lesser press these days with regards to security threats. Regardless of the severity of the faults on the Mac, it seems that this is a breach in the "security hull", and the Mac with its recent gain in popularity (although still minimal at this point) is already facing some teething issues. But you may be right and I may be overreacting to these new types of Mac threats.

What is definitely more objective i the Mac's lack of integration and compatibility when compared to XP. Yes my PocketPc runs windows mobile (don't they all? Only Palms runs ... Palm!).

My "resistance" was more of a nudge than anything else, although I do not appreciate having one company rule it all. And yes you are right utility guides my choice of a system before anything else; in my case Virus free, reliable machine with the software I care for.

I may have depected a too dim picture of my mac experience, most surely due to the "neighbours greener grass" syndrome, but I wanted to give an honest feedback of my experience, and yes as crazy as it may soun owning a Mac restricts my computer joe experience as I cannot run everything (yes virus included :-), and I cannot buy anything for my Mac, I am tied in because of the lac of support. And in this specific case Windows does give me more choice as a consumer, hence my remarks.

Didn't mean to offend anyone really, I was just looking for others to share their experience with me and see if anybody else had the same thoughts as I did.

Feel free to contribute some more.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Reality strikes back
by evangs on Wed 22nd Feb 2006 08:40 in reply to "RE[2]: Reality strikes back"
evangs Member since:

It just seems from an outsider's point of view that windows seems to be getting lesser press these days with regards to security threats.

You do realize it's far more exciting to report about a Mac OS X flaw than it is to report on a Windows flaw? For years we've been hearing about Windows security flaws, reporting on it regularly is like saying it rains in Blackpool. Contrast that with security flaws on OS X, which has always been touted as being superior to Windows XP.

Tell ya what, why not get a PC and use XP for a while. You'll see how the grass isn't really greener on the other side.

Reply Parent Score: 3