Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 22nd Feb 2006 22:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 98392
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-06-28
>1. battery life - very short, less than a day, some only for 6 hours or so
This is not true. Windows Mobile 5 is amazing on battery life. Look some of the newer HTC models and you will see that battery life is just fine, as long as you use the right hardware parts.
>2. ease of use - phone is a PITA to access, dial, etc
I didn't have any problem with that.
>3. form factor - bulky as a phone
Not this phone. This the first Windows PDA/phone that is actually not bulky at all. It's smaller than my Linux-based Motorola one.
>4. stability - Windows Mobile is not stable and has to be reset frequently
Well, depends what you run. Windows Mobile has 20,000 apps out there, some of them are old or bad enough to bring down the OS. Same goes for PalmOS' 28,000 apps. Compare that to 500 apps of Nokia's Symbian and you will see that it will fair better with stability in that regard.
>5. poor screens - extremely hard to see outdoors
This is not true. It all depends what screens the hardware manufacturer is buying to use for their product. It has nothing to do with the fact if something is a Windows PDA or not.