To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
>And it's obvious that you are a troll. Windows Mobile
>proved very stable here.
A troll? because WM was stable at your place? huh?
I was not talking about stability..........
I have a Qtek 220 (out of my head) PDA/Phone.
It can, but that never worked, navigate, be a phone, a camera, an internet device etc.
It is an PDA with phone functions and it really sucks.
But i guess that is all the fault of the hardware because the software is obvoius flawless
Edited 2006-02-22 23:39
I can't find that Qtek model on google. Maybe it's a very old model, back in the days where Win2003 was trying to be a hybrid. But WinMob5.1 is a whole new animal. It was modified and extended to BE a phone more than a PDA.
It's like comparing Win98 to WinXP. Different animals.







Member since:
2005-06-28
>Its obvious you are always trying to defend WM.
And it's obvious that you are a troll. Windows Mobile proved very stable here.
>Fact is i have a windows mobile phone
Do you have the PDA or the Smartphone edition? You see, the Smartphone edition of Windows Mobile SUCKS. My husband has one of those and I get cramps each time I have to use it.
But the PDA edition of the phone -- like this one reviewed--, is not bad at all. And that's the truth of it, you like it or not.