Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 22nd Feb 2006 22:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 98409
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Windows Mobile phones are not good phones.
by Eugenia on Wed 22nd Feb 2006 23:41
in reply to "RE[3]: Windows Mobile phones are not good phones."
I can't find that Qtek model on google. Maybe it's a very old model, back in the days where Win2003 was trying to be a hybrid. But WinMob5.1 is a whole new animal. It was modified and extended to BE a phone more than a PDA.
It's like comparing Win98 to WinXP. Different animals.
RE[5]: Windows Mobile phones are not good phones.
by devnull on Wed 22nd Feb 2006 23:46
in reply to "RE[4]: Windows Mobile phones are not good phones."







Member since:
2005-07-06
>And it's obvious that you are a troll. Windows Mobile
>proved very stable here.
A troll? because WM was stable at your place? huh?
I was not talking about stability..........
I have a Qtek 220 (out of my head) PDA/Phone.
It can, but that never worked, navigate, be a phone, a camera, an internet device etc.
It is an PDA with phone functions and it really sucks.
But i guess that is all the fault of the hardware because the software is obvoius flawless
Edited 2006-02-22 23:39