Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 98627
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-03
I might well be wrong, but I understand from the Fedora site that AIGLX's purpose is to make it easier to "use GL effects", while XGL tries to do accelerate all X graphics output via GL.
For instance, GTL+ talks to Cairo, and Cairo would talk to X via Render in AIGLX, with no 3D intervention, while it would directly output OpenGL calls via Glitz in XGL.
If this is true, both would allow funky accelerated window managers, but XGL would accelerate Gnome as well. Again, I might be wrong: this is all VERY confusing.