Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 27th Feb 2006 05:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 99611
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-01-04
While I do agree that Windows server 2003 is a great server OS, with many security improvements, I donīt believe that Vista will be the most secure OS just because its based on Server 2003 code.
Firstly, its generally harder to a secure a general purpose system, such as a desktop. There are way more legacy applications for the desktop, and the users are not all that skilled. So you have compromise more between usability and security.
Secondly, I think that there are other OSīes that are designed with even more security in mind than Server 2003 and Vista. OpenBSD and Solaris are some examples of this.
Edited 2006-02-27 10:34