Linked by Andrew Youll on Wed 27th Jul 2005 16:58 UTC, submitted by Qwerty
Thread beginning with comment 9982
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Evert:
Hmm, somehow you tried to correct my points by stating them again.
The original poster was whining about 1,5MB JPEGs, so I pointed out that a lossless PNG would be even bigger. If what the poster really wanted was a lossless image, well PNG is not the only format for that, a BMP or TIFF would do just as well.
Then he ranted on about PNG support in IE, but the only issues are related to transparency, nothing of relevance for screenshots.




Member since:
2005-07-06
PNG is a losless format, JPEG is not. that's why PNG's are bigger. But maybe you want to check the PNG compression rate, not all apps compress the PNG file to the optimum...
Screenshots, IE, and transparany are no problem at all because screenshots should not use transparancy. Anyway, IE only has transparancy problems if you use multiple alpha channels for your PNG file.
Microsoft just doesn't like PNG that much, on the other hand: you can store PNG files from MS Paint.