Profile    Comments    Submissions    Bookmarks   
Friends & Fans    Starred Stories    Recommendations    RSS   
Read Kebabbert's comments via RSS: RSS
Comments 1 through 15 of 308 > »
RE[7]: Another Revolution *Poof* (posted 2009-11-22 12:08:18)
Score: 2
Attached to: IBM Halts Future Cell Development
RE[4]: Another Revolution *Poof* (posted 2009-11-21 21:24:28)
Score: 2
1 response(s), 3 in thread
Attached to: IBM Halts Future Cell Development
RE[2]: Another Revolution *Poof* (posted 2009-11-20 22:48:32)
Score: 3
1 response(s), 6 in thread
Attached to: IBM Halts Future Cell Development
RE[4]: It sounds like... (posted 2009-11-08 12:57:43)
Score: 3
Attached to: 'No, ZFS Really Doesn't Need a fsck'
RE[2]: Contradictory post... (posted 2009-11-07 17:14:57)
Score: 3
1 response(s), 1 in thread
Attached to: 'No, ZFS Really Doesn't Need a fsck'
As someone wrote: (posted 2009-11-07 12:19:40)
Score: 2
Attached to: 'No, ZFS Really Doesn't Need a fsck'
RE: SUN needs to be plagued (posted 2009-11-06 20:33:04)
Score: 2
Attached to: Next-Generation Linux File Systems
RE: No need for fsck. Period. (posted 2009-11-05 18:36:21)
Score: 2
Attached to: Should ZFS Have a fsck Tool?
RE[2]: Competition is good (posted 2009-11-05 08:35:16)
Score: 3
Attached to: Next-Generation Linux File Systems
No need for fsck. Period. (posted 2009-11-04 22:46:28)
Score: 2
1 response(s), 1 in thread
Attached to: Should ZFS Have a fsck Tool?
Competition is good (posted 2009-11-04 22:40:24)
Score: 1
1 response(s), 3 in thread
Attached to: Next-Generation Linux File Systems
RE[3]: Comment by DOSguy (posted 2009-11-04 22:23:21)
Score: 2
Attached to: Should ZFS Have a fsck Tool?
RE[2]: Clarification requested (posted 2009-11-04 15:57:53)
Score: 2
Attached to: ZFS Gets Deduplication
RE: Comment by DOSguy (posted 2009-11-04 12:06:37)
Score: 2
1 response(s), 2 in thread
Attached to: Should ZFS Have a fsck Tool?
RE[6]: I skimmed the article... (posted 2009-11-04 12:02:17)
Score: 2
1 response(s), 1 in thread
Attached to: ZFS Gets Deduplication