Profile    Comments    Submissions    Bookmarks   
Friends & Fans    Starred Stories    Recommendations    RSS   
Read jwwf's comments via RSS: RSS
« < Comments 149 through 163 of 163
RE[3]: Proud? (posted 2006-10-23 16:15:54)
Score: 5
1 response(s), 4 in thread
Attached to: One Week Back to Windows
RE: Rebirth (posted 2006-10-21 01:44:48)
Score: 2
Attached to: Mainframe 2.0 Concepts for Java Developers
RE[2]: Reviewer can't be taken seriously (posted 2006-10-16 17:54:53)
Score: 1
Attached to: Review: Zenwalk GNU/Linux 3
RE[4]: USD vs. EUR (posted 2006-09-06 17:43:42)
Score: 2
2 response(s), 6 in thread
Attached to: Apple Updates iMac, Mac Mini
RE[2]: IBM doesn't like Open Solaris (posted 2006-08-04 14:42:05)
Score: 3
Attached to: IBM Commits to AIX and Linux
RE[6]: It is time (posted 2006-07-29 14:35:45)
Score: 1
Attached to: United States Cedes Control of the Internet - Or Not?
RE[2]: A reason to watch soccer (posted 2006-06-14 03:11:00)
Score: 5
2 response(s), 2 in thread
Attached to: Watch the World Cup in ASCII
RE: Intel misses the point...again. (posted 2006-03-08 00:18:33)
Score: 1
Attached to: Partnership Set to Run RISC Software on Intel Chips
RE[2]: @ Milo_Hoffman (posted 2006-03-05 03:09:42)
Score: 1
Attached to: Sun's McNealy Wants HP-UX/Solaris Merger
RE[3]: More fud from Sun (posted 2006-03-05 00:33:09)
Score: 1
1 response(s), 1 in thread
Attached to: Sun's McNealy Wants HP-UX/Solaris Merger
RE: More fud from Sun (posted 2006-03-04 23:33:15)
Score: 1
1 response(s), 3 in thread
Attached to: Sun's McNealy Wants HP-UX/Solaris Merger
Re[6]: Wow (posted 2006-01-29 00:33:59)
Score: 2
Attached to: Next Itanium Consumes Less Power
Re[4]: Wow (posted 2006-01-28 13:38:09)
Score: 1
1 response(s), 1 in thread
Attached to: Next Itanium Consumes Less Power
Old news? (posted 2006-01-20 23:46:44)
Score: 1
Attached to: Intel Scraps Once-Crucial Itanium Feature
But why bother? (posted 2006-01-19 19:12:10)
Score: 1
Attached to: Linux Users May Be Violating Sarbanes-Oxley