Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 12th Sep 2007 04:14 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source Here is an interview with Richard Stallman about a range of free software topics including GPLv3 and comment on the Microsoft patent issue. Stallman has a go at Linus Torvalds even suggesting that if people want to keep their freedom they better not follow Torvalds. From the interview: "The fact that Torvalds says "open source" instead of "free software" shows where he is coming from. I wrote the GNU GPL to defend freedom for all users of all versions of a program. I developed version 3 to do that job better and protect against new threats. Torvalds says he rejects this goal; that's probably why he doesn't appreciate GPL version 3. I respect his right to express his views, even though I think they are foolish. However, if you don't want to lose your freedom, you had better not follow him."
Thread beginning with comment 270458
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: GPL is no good
by postmodern on Wed 12th Sep 2007 07:31 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: GPL is no good"
Member since:

Paraphrasing Wikipedia, socialism is listed as a socio-economic model where wealth and property distribution is managed by the 'community'. You can have direct socialism such as workers'-councils or indirect socialism exercised by the state.

Communism is more considered to be a subset of Socialism, but with more specific goals such as creating a classless/state-less society with common-ownership of production.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: GPL is no good
by rajj on Wed 12th Sep 2007 07:36 in reply to "RE[4]: GPL is no good"
rajj Member since:

Yeah, I realized after I posted that I had probably lulled myself into a false dichotomy. Either way, communism is a socio-economic (or lack there of) model.

Reply Parent Score: 1