Many screenshots and info for the leaked, upcoming, Windows Mobile 2005.
Windows Mobile 2005 (aka Magneto) Leaks Out
About The Author
Eugenia Loli
Ex-programmer, ex-editor in chief at OSNews.com, now a visual artist/filmmaker.
Follow me on Twitter @EugeniaLoli
I know it’s offtopic, but out of curiosity I clicked statistics button on phonemag.com and here are the results: http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=s19phonemag&…
All I can say is wow!
WOW indeed 🙂
Does this mean that Palm1’s new OS will be code named Xavier? Or maybe X-Men?
🙂
That is awsome but sometimes you have to look at external factors such as much of the sites statistics come from OSS centric people. But these numbers area good start.
That is awsome but sometimes you have to look at external factors such as much of the sites statistics come from OSS centric people. But these numbers area good start.
Nevertheless – those figures represent money.
I cant decide which is more unbelievable, Firefox at 51% or Safari at 8%. I work for an all Mac shop, and over half of our people use Firefox instead of Safari as the defalt browser. If this is any indication, the number of mac users visiting this site are abnormaly inflated.
Go Market Share!
And….what’s so great about Magneto?
well, it’s a Microsoft operating system designed for PDAs
Pretty well nothing, in other words.Doesn’t look revolutionary or evolutionary.
“Doesn’t look revolutionary or evolutionary.”
Oh, it LOOKS evolutionary… The media player sure looks like an offspring of Quicktime player.
All I want is..
* Stable Platform Manager that doesn’t crash and bring down the IDE with it
* Centre and right-aligning editboxes
* Better POSIX API implementation (anything’s better than CE2 though)
* Oh yes.. transparent backgrounds on text would be nice too, like in Windows
If CE5 requires some EVC5 in order to develop for it, I’ll be miffed. If CE5 doesn’t support EVC4 projects (as was the case with EVC4 and CE3) I’ll be going straight to Redmond to break some heads.
(And speaking of EVC5, can can C++ constructors and destructors please work on static objects again like they did in V3..? Pretty please..?)
— Angry CE application developer