In an interview with LinuxQuestions.org, Jeremy Hogan, Manager of Community Relations at Red Hat, explains what the Fedora project is (and isn’t), the importance of OEMs for Linux, how Red Hat has managed to become profitable, what direction Red Hat is headed in and what his take is on being called the “MS of Linux”.
So… there wouldn’t be RHX(10).
I hope that Fedora retains the RH quality of software, and I hope there wouldn’t be Fedora zealots like ….. you know who
Dear gawd. RedHat has never made “quality software.”
They’ve included beta versions of GCC (that couldn’t even compile the kernel no less), Linux kernels that swapped constantly because of a badly implemented VM system (early 2.4), and have so many dependancies that a useless “minimal” install is bigger than a somewhat more funtional default install of Windows XP.
You need to try some other Linux distros or a BSD.
I did, and kept coming back to RH
. and i’m satisfied with RH’s performance since thunderbird.
If your happy and have no complaints, stick with it then
I could just be very unlucky with RedHat.
I was incredibly unhappy with Microsoft, the (lack of) quality in their software, and it’s “blind leading the naked” advocacy. I was deciding whether to write a disgruntled rambling manifesto to the CEO, or launch a bootp server and take over the whole infrastructure and hold it hostage until they rebuilt my machine when a recruiter called me.
who is u know who