<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17229/More_US_States_Mull_OpenDocument_Move</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:57:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211535</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211535</guid>
			<description>It only seems appropriate that an ISO certified standard file format be used by government. Lets hope these bills pass, forcing Microsoft to naively support ODF opening the office playing field for all users.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Seth Quarrier)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211546</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211546</guid>
			<description>What's that? Is it a bird? A Plane?<br />
No, It's Microsoft! And what's that? They've suddenly grown a great interest in the law making process? Why that's great; We need all the help we can get!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211549</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211549</guid>
			<description><b>forcing Microsoft to naively support ODF</b><br />
<br />
Did you mean naively or natively?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Larz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211552</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211552</guid>
			<description>Lets hope these bills pass, forcing Microsoft to naively support ODF opening the office playing field for all users<br />
<br />
Actually this is only one option and from most people's point of view the better one.<br />
<br />
Another option, and likely from Microsoft's point of view the better one, is to circumvent the spirit of the law but following its letters: by pushing even harder for their format to become an official ISO standard.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anda_skoa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Spreadsheets with no formulas ==</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211563</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211563</guid>
			<description>Perfect government accountability. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (n4cer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211633</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211633</guid>
			<description>Very true.  My guess is we can start expecting Microsoft to start greasing the pockets of many politicians to keep OpenDoc out.<br />
<br />
Kind of a side thought here, but I always get a chuckle out the government.  One day they sue Microsoft for being a monopoly and not playing fair.  The next day they tell you that their websites are only compatible with Microsoft IE or that they only accept Microsoft Office document formats.<br />
<br />
I'm sure OpenDoc will have a fight on it's hands trying to supplant Microsoft's document format.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (systyrant)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211665</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211665</guid>
			<description>Good call, I wish my brain would spell natively. I meant natively but it seems that the edit has timed out. I guess that is why re-reading comments before submission is a good thing <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  (for some reason aspell doesn't seem to have 'natively' in its dictanary, maybe that was the issue.)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Seth Quarrier)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211831</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211831</guid>
			<description>Nor does it have 'dictionary' in its dictionary, apparently.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (maxx_730)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211835</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211835</guid>
			<description>Note that OpenDoc died a horrible, painful death at the hands of Steve Jobs in 1997.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDoc" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDoc</a><br />
<br />
ODF, on the other hand, is alive and well.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Constantine XVI)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Nice to see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211836</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211836</guid>
			<description>I forgot about that.  In the future I will stick to ODF.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (systyrant)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Correction</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?211941</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?211941</guid>
			<description><i>The XML-based document format is a rival to Microsoft's Office technology.</i><br />
<br />
Actually, the ODF format <i>is</i> an ISO approved international standard, and microsoft's confusingly named format is rivaling ODF. Although microsoft tries to turn its proprietary &quot;Open&quot; XML format into an open/international standard, it is not. See;<br />
<a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007011720521698" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007011720521698</a> <br />
<br />
- hayalci</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hayalci)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
