<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/17965/BeleniX_0_6_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:47:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>This looks extremely cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242624</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242624</guid>
			<description>This looks extremely cool - the problem is that it requires a primary partition - bugger</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flywheel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Software</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242630</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242630</guid>
			<description>Can I install the non-free software from Sun on it? It would be nice if I could use Sun Studio. It's one great professional IDE.<br />
<br />
I know there's a Linux version available, but it only supports RHEL4 and SLES9.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rx182)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sun Studio 11</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242640</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242640</guid>
			<description>There's absolutely no problem doing this on Nexenta (GNU/Solaris) so I highly doubt there will be a problem with BeliniX.<br />
<br />
BeliniX is fully binary compatible with Solaris (since it IS Solaris) so the only problem I could foresee is the possible need for either Gnome or Sun's Java desktop System which is also Gnome, albeit a Sun branded Gnome version, since it comes with KDE and Xfce instead.<br />
<br />
Basically, since Sun Studio runs on OpenSolaris it'll run on BeliniX, I'm sure!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (s_groening)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: This looks extremely cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242661</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242661</guid>
			<description>And where's the problem?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (justin.68)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pretty Nice...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242668</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242668</guid>
			<description>Still a bit rough around the edges, but still as close as you can get to Desktop Solaris...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (madcrow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242674</guid>
			<description>BeleniX is the most feature packed distro of OpenSolaris and has many good features. One of the most important part of a LiveCD is the boot time and BeleniX boots up real fast. Can't wait to download and try it out soon.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://osgeek.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://osgeek.blogspot.com</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (osgeek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242699</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242699</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">BeleniX is the most feature packed distro of OpenSolaris and has many good features. One of the most important part of a LiveCD is the boot time and BeleniX boots up real fast. Can't wait to download and try it out soon.  </div><br />
<br />
And better still, its 100% Solaris, it isn't like GNU Solaris which, quite frankly, uses butchered GNU userspace ontop of a Solaris kernel. IMHO, if one is going to do that, one might as well run Linux and be done with it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: This looks extremely cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242712</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242712</guid>
			<description>I haven't got any primary partitions.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flywheel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: This looks extremely cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242715</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242715</guid>
			<description>You can press p <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dually)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: This looks extremely cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242730</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242730</guid>
			<description>I think I'm going to try this. ON is outdated at 60 but I'll look into upgrading to latest.<br />
<br />
Nexenta is in very pitiful shape; BeleniX is both a LiveCD and installable plus has new packages.<br />
<br />
This might be the mini (1 CD) OpenSolaris distro I'm looking for. That would defiently be a plus over downloading 6 CDs or one large DVD and installing all that Solaris Express bloat.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242749</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242749</guid>
			<description>&quot;it isn't like GNU Solaris which, quite frankly, uses butchered GNU userspace ontop of a Solaris kernel&quot;<br />
<br />
Well, according to BeleniX roadmap they are planning to try to have both: a fully OpenSolaris-based version of BeleniX but also another version of BeleniX that does run a GNU/OSS software stack (including most daemons) on top of the OpenSolaris Kernel, just like Nexenta (=GNU/Solaris) does: <br />
<a href="http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/?q=roadmap" rel="nofollow">http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/?q=roadmap</a>     <br />
<br />
As OpenSolaris and its &quot;distributions&quot; are still quite new, I suppose that developers still want to experiment a lot and try all sorts of alternatives.<br />
<br />
I like the BeleniX choice of using pkgsrc as their software management framework. Although deb/apt-get chosen by Nexenta may be a good choice too, Pkgsrc (developed by NetBSD) might suit Solaris better as it is very OS/platform neutral and may be more advanced (both binary packages and building from source, good security framework etc.). <br />
<br />
By the way, there's a good introduction to Pkgsrc in this short pdf <br />
&quot;Pkgsrc - A Framework for Portable Software Management&quot;: <br />
<a href="http://www.netbsd.org/gallery/advocacy/sschumacher/a4-pkgsrc-en.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.netbsd.org/gallery/advocacy/sschumacher/a4-pkgsrc-en.pdf</a> Edited 2007-05-23 19:48</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (irbis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>KDE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242782</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242782</guid>
			<description>What version of KDE? Same as in opensolaris?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aliquis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: KDE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242830</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242830</guid>
			<description>Yes the same. I believe it is 3.5.1.<br />
<br />
Belenix is definitely the best OpenSolaris distro because  it uses KDE <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . I have used Solaris Developer Express and that looks very sleek too. Although I have Solaris installed I switch from my Linux box as there are no compelling reasons for doing it apart from learning a thing or two.<br />
<br />
Maybe I should learn to use DTrace <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zaphod)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242831</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242831</guid>
			<description>The good thing about Belenix is that it has a lot of GNU userland which is very good for someone transitioning from Linux to Solaris. I have used a stock Solaris system and it is very 'unfriendly' (sh with no tab completion totally sucks)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zaphod)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242841</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242841</guid>
			<description>But at the same time it is unwise to simply replace something with a GNU equivilant simply because applications written against the GNU library is fundamentally broken; case in point being libc - why replace libc with GNU libc when the more prudent step would be to encourage developers to use proper calls rather than hack extensions to the standard.<br />
<br />
Bring in parts which aren't available, extend existing components to include features, but don't simply replace something to make it compatible with a poorly written application - because ultimately it ends up being a slippery slope - where does it end?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 04:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242920</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242920</guid>
			<description>Yes it is 100% Solaris which is 100% Unix. And my previous comment got modded down for some unknown reason.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://osgeek.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://osgeek.blogspot.com</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (osgeek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Downloading it now.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242922</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242922</guid>
			<description>I can't see me switching to it from Debian or FreeBSD, but it'll be good to learn the Solaris way, I hope</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BluenoseJake)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: KDE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?242936</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?242936</guid>
			<description>Belenix has KDE 3.5.1 as does Nexenta but Belenix's actually works whereas Nexenta's craps out with a Konqueror errors all over.<br />
<br />
I think it's possible to get KDE 3.5.6 on Solaris and it's distros too:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://public.enst.fr/pkgsrc/packages/SunOS-5.10/i386/pkgsrc-essentiel-2006Q4n3/kde/" rel="nofollow">http://public.enst.fr/pkgsrc/packages/SunOS-5.10/i386/pkgsrc-essent...</a>   <br />
<br />
That said, this version of BeleniX comes with build 60 and cannot see my hard drive; I think build 61 is the first to recognize my ICH7 SATA controller. I dont think their is a way to do a BFU from a ramdisk because a reboot is required.<br />
<br />
So I'll just have to wait for the next update and hope it comes with the latest ON build.Edited 2007-05-24 17:12</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Xaero_Vincent)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: KDE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?243023</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?243023</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">That said, this version of BeleniX comes with build 60 and cannot see my hard drive; I think build 61 is the first to recognize my ICH7 SATA controller. I dont think their is a way to do a BFU from a ramdisk because a reboot is required. <br />
<br />
So I'll just have to wait for the next update and hope it comes with the latest ON build.  </div><br />
<br />
Thats strange, I'm running a ICH7 SATA controller in this laptop, and I can run Solaris from build 55 and up; I think it would be best to make sure that you have AHCI enabled as most motherboards default to EHCI (RAID enabled).</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
