<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19463/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_5_2_Beta_Available</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:17:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Red Hat wasn't there</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?304789</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?304789</guid>
			<description>I missed you guys at CeBIT in Hannover last week.<br />
 Any people out there affiliated with Red Hat that can explain what the motives were not to go there?<br />
 Just curious.<br />
 Love your OS, RHEL 5.2 won't shock the planet but 5 has disappointed very few since it came out.Edited 2008-03-12 21:59 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (h3rman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Release notes:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?304921</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?304921</guid>
			<description><a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2008-March/msg00000.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2008-March/msg00000....</a> <br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Red Hat wasn't there</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?305270</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?305270</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">... but 5 has disappointed very few since it came out. </div><br />
<br />
I can't say that I agree.<br />
I find RHEL to be far better (both RHEL/server and Cent5/desktop) then RHEL4.<br />
<br />
Any particular reasons for the disappointment?<br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Red Hat wasn't there</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?305306</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?305306</guid>
			<description>Sorry for the misunderstanding.<br />
I meant the opposite, very few people, I think, were disappointed with RHEL 5.<br />
RHEL 5 is great.<br />
It's my main system for both server and desktop (well, CentOS that is, 100% binarily compatible of course).</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (h3rman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Red Hat wasn't there</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?305365</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?305365</guid>
			<description>Oh OK.<br />
<br />
P.S. I share your problem. While RHEL5 is an excellent server distribution (and we use it for testing and production), CentOS is a far better workstation/desktop distribution.<br />
<br />
Having no OpenOffice (and huge chunks of KDE missing) in the RHEL5 &quot;server&quot; is very annoying. (And our purchase department rather no get the &quot;workstation/multi OS&quot; SKU)<br />
<br />
It would have been nice if RedHat would have retained the &quot;Desktop&quot; software channel.<br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
