Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 116136
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Does proprietary software belong in open-source?
by Mitarai on Tue 18th Apr 2006 22:15
in reply to "RE: Does proprietary software belong in open-source?"
RE[2]: Does proprietary software belong in open-source?
by SpasmaticSeacow on Wed 19th Apr 2006 15:25
in reply to "RE: Does proprietary software belong in open-source?"
I would add that the open-source Nvidia drivers are demonstrably more stable than Nvidia's own drivers and support a wider variety of kernel configurations.
That said, the Nvidia driver has MUCH better 3D performance, even if they don't support as many X extensions as the open-source drivers do.






Member since:
2005-09-06
Why dont you actualy try and use ati drivers before posting. ati shouldnt have a right to develop drivers any more. If you have used their(ati) drivers you would know that open source 2d drivers are 10x better at being stable than anything ati has or has had. I would go off and list 30 problems alone with ati drivers, but I will spare you from the list. Just to name one problem, well my card would hard lock some times when logging out of gnome(doesnt happen with open source or nvidia drivers).
I am not seriously saying ati shouldnt be developing drivers, but in no way should they ever be included with the kernel.