Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th May 2006 14:05 UTC, submitted by Mystilleef
Benchmarks Jasjeet Sekhon benchmarked Linux and MacOS X on the MacBook Pro using his statistical software, and finds that "Linux is found to be much faster than Apple's OS X for statistical computing. For example, in one benchmark Linux is more than twice as fast." Earlier, he ran tests on a G5 and an Opteron, and conlcuded: "Those results were terrible for OS X and not particularly good for the G5 (970) chip. For example, my 2.7 pound Pentium-M Linux laptop is faster than my 44 pound G5 running OS X. The floating point performance of the 970 chip leaves much to be desired, but OS X makes the performance problem significantly worse."
Thread beginning with comment 121916
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I believe jeffb it's right on this. The topic shouldn't be "look how slow is OSX compared to Linux in this kind of calculation" but "Look how performance-unpotimized is OSX kernel". If we start comparing the Oses, it's all going to be "my OS is faster" "my Os is slower but gives better experience"... we're not going anywhere. In the end, while I still believe productivity isn't completely related to speed and that a rational and well designed interface could compensate some performance issues, I also believe OSX kernel could use some speed improvements.

(Which is why I was completely puzzled by the latest Vista build which is not only slow (as ervery beta is anyway) but it's also taking steps in creating the interface less streamlined and more cumbersome, resulting in less and less productivity (like all those modal security requesters. Every time I launch a control app the computer comes to a stop... might have some sense, but it simply doesn't work for me))

Reply Parent Score: 2