To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They must've corrected it by now:
1.6 is our fourth major DragonFly release. DragonFly's policy is to only commit bug fixes to release branches.
On another note: that's one massive releaselist! A big list of new features and improvements.
What pains me is that I consider DragonflyBSD the OS that has the most exciting developments going on, but: it's not usable for desktop use by a longshot (not too sure it's ready for server-use either). There's no DE yet, although recently I read of an XFCE beta, and there's little 'big' software running on it from what I can tell, since porting to DfBSD is less straightforward than normal, especially in the absence of the major widget-platforms.
Of course, for such needs there are alternative platforms, but with DragonflyBSD I at least get the feeling it's going places.
no DE, no widget-platforms ? There are KDE, Gnome,...Qt, Gtk... in fact the same software as NetBSD (through pkgsrc).
Of course it may not be fully "desktop ready" compared to Linux for example. Dragonfly has a lot of rough edges, evidently. But it is quite usable (if you are not a beginner in the *nix world of course).
I think it used to say that "1.4.4 is the fourth bug-fix sub-release in the 1.4 release branch", which means they released 4 bugfix updates to the previous release (1.4).
Maybe this page is inaccurate in other parts as well:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/release1_6.cgi
E.g. there are two consecutive sections called "Release Notes for DragonFly 1.6.0". I think the second one is about 1.6 and the previous one about 1.4, but I could be wrong.





Member since:
2005-08-08
I know you just copy&pasted from the release notes, but seems odd to call 1.6.0 "the fourth bug-fix sub-release in the 1.6 release branch". Maybe they meant in the 1.0 release branch.