Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Aug 2006 18:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 149871
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: No builtin Remote Desktop?
by altair on Mon 7th Aug 2006 19:21
in reply to "RE[4]: No builtin Remote Desktop?"
RE[5]: No builtin Remote Desktop?
by Roguelazer on Mon 7th Aug 2006 19:22
in reply to "RE[4]: No builtin Remote Desktop?"
RE[6]: No builtin Remote Desktop?
by ronaldst on Mon 7th Aug 2006 19:25
in reply to "RE[5]: No builtin Remote Desktop?"
RE[6]: No builtin Remote Desktop?
by Troels on Mon 7th Aug 2006 19:42
in reply to "RE[5]: No builtin Remote Desktop?"
But it doesn't do the same as XP's viewer, i wouldn't want to do a days work through VNC, even over a 100Mbps line, it is simply too slow. On top of that i have yet to see a VNC implementation where it doesn't occasionally (or sometimes constantly) forget to update parts of the screen. In contrast i can easily work through RDP, the lag is only really noticeable when i do things like image editing. (And i'm even connected remotely to the RDP session through citrix, so i get double lag)
RE[5]: No builtin Remote Desktop?
by netpython on Mon 7th Aug 2006 19:22
in reply to "RE[4]: No builtin Remote Desktop?"






Member since:
2005-06-29
The viewer costs money,

XP home includes the viewer. XP Pro has viewer and the terminal part. IIRC the viewer is also downloadable for NT and W2K.
Thank you for proving my point.