To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Neither company is all that innocent.
Rumor does have it that Marc Andressen snuck off with the Mosaic source, and that Netscape's browser was based on that.
However, Microsoft licensed the same code from Spyglass for a percentage of the royalties and then proceded to give the browser away, effectively screwing Spyglass as well.
Besides, the main thrust of the complaint about Microsoft was not the fact that the MSIE browser was free, but rather than the MSIE browser was tied into the OS in such a way that it could not be removed w/o potentially breaking other subsystems and applications.
Please. Get real. And try to limit the revisionist history. Many of us were also there, and we remember very well what occurred.
Edited 2006-08-23 17:44
Netscape?
Ever run Netscape Navigator or Communicator on Windows? there is a reason it was called "Nutscrape" by end users and web developers alike, it was an awful product that was prone to hanging, crashing and corrupting mail firles.
When Microsoft improved Internet Explorer, Netscape took its MONOPOLY for granted and assumed that people would jjust keep using their product, irrespective of how crap it was; well, they were proven wrong, end users migrated away, seeing that yes, it was actually possible to surf the internet without having a browser crash everytime it came accross a Java applet or a Flash/Shockwave object that needed loading.





Member since:
2005-07-18
All the competition that has died, has died because their products were crap - I challange anyone here to name *ONE* product that was killed because of Microsofts 'anti-competitive' nature - name *ONE*.
Netscape?