Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Sep 2006 13:59 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 166127
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-05
It'd be pretty mean to begrudge ESR his moment in the limelight here. Maybe he could do with a bit of extra dough, too. Who knows. Does it matter?
I'm not sure ESR is right about the move to 64-bit being all that significant. It probably doesn't mean anything to Joe Sixpack, anyway. More important are interoperability and connectivity. Folks do want an OS to which all kinds of peripherals can connect seamlessly and which can play all sorts of streams and formats. Which would you prefer: a 32-bit OS that works with your camera and external players or a 64-bit one that doesn't?
Someone above mentioned various famous names who could have joined the Freespire board instead. Each one of them would bring a large element of politics, alas, imho. At the moment, Linux generally seems to be going through a bad patch with politics which must be draining energies everywhere.