Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Aug 2005 12:40 UTC, submitted by zam001
X11, Window Managers "After discussing this with several people I have decided to stop working on EGL and Xgl. The recent work on EXA is going to have the side effect of pushing out any hope for an Xgl release by a year or more. By extending the 2D drivers to accelerate composite end user demand for Xgl will also be reduced. I can not justify devoting further time to this project without reasonable hope of it reaching completion."
Thread beginning with comment 17411
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Sad but true
by Jamie on Fri 12th Aug 2005 13:52 UTC in reply to "RE: Sad but true"
Jamie
Member since:
2005-07-06

AFAIK glitz is not dependent on XGL and is simply a layer above openGL so it should work on any X server that has mesa/DRI or vendor specific opengl drivers.

Glitz future will not be impacted by this. Cairo needs to be accelerated and so glitz is just too important in that respect. I would suspect Reveman is probably spending more time getting glitz to work rather than XGL as Cairo is now imminent.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Sad but true
by on Fri 12th Aug 2005 14:00 in reply to "RE[2]: Sad but true"
Member since:

>AFAIK glitz is not dependent on XGL

true, it's the other way around : XGL depends on glitz

Reply Parent Score: 0