To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don't you know that exciting headlines, albeit almost never true, generate more ad revenue?
For the millionth time: We do NOT get payed at OSNews! How many times do I have to repeat that before it gets through?
Journalistic ethics are so low nowadays that this is nothing...in-fact, quite normal.
Go complain at BetaNews, *they* supplied the news. Is it my right to change the original author's intentions?
For the billion time, if you want to be called an editor, act like one.
It is not only your right, but your obligation to provide truthful headlines, even if they vary from whatever source you are linking to.
It would do you wonders to take a journalism class before you feel entitled to act and respond the way you do.
...other than that, there *is* pressure from Microsoft, as they are in *direct* competition with Sun in this field, so there *inherently* is pressure.
It's not my problem that people see "Pressure from MS" and think: "Lawsuits! Patent issues! Anti competative behaviour!". It says more about the *reader* than about the author.
Precisely what pressure? If you can't see the pressure that MS Office exerts on OOo, you my friend are blind. Let's not split hairs under the false pretense of journalistic integrity. For crying out loud, MICROSOFT is the owner and developer of MS Office. That is *Precisely* how they factor into providing pressure.
Rather than microanalyze the freaking headline, just acknowledge the real issue. Pull your head out of the sand and go to war, don't attack us.





Member since:
2005-07-04
Yet somehow, that seems to make it into the OSNews headline as "MS Pressure". Precisely what pressure was applied by Microsoft that caused the delay of Star Office 8?
Don't you know that exciting headlines, albeit almost never true, generate more ad revenue? MS Pressure is much more exciting than Sun Loses Contract. The first thing I thought when I saw that was that MS had threatened a patent lawsuit or something. So, of course, I click on the story....but it really had nothing exciting. Journalistic ethics are so low nowadays that this is nothing...in-fact, quite normal.