Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 13:22 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight
Thread beginning with comment 184378
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: For those that can't be bothered to RTFA
by segedunum on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 15:12
in reply to "For those that can't be bothered to RTFA"
There's no fee, you don't owe Microsoft any royalties, and the license is perpetual—meaning that the terms won't change....
I have read the article, and I don't care one fig about whether Microsoft has been so kind and generous as to not make people owe royalties. Why? Because licensing it is not necessary and a load of rubbish.
You can't license user interfaces, or try and protect them in ways that many companies tried in so many ways to do in the eighties.
Stop making it look as if Microsoft is doing everyone a gracious favour.
End.
RE[2]: For those that can't be bothered to RTFA
by andrewg on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 15:23
in reply to "RE: For those that can't be bothered to RTFA"




Member since:
2005-11-09
"Today, we're announcing a licensing program for the 2007 Microsoft Office system user interface which allows virtually anyone to obtain a royalty-free license to use the new Office UI....
There's no fee, you don't owe Microsoft any royalties, and the license is perpetual—meaning that the terms won't change....
In the guidelines you'll find REQUIRED sections and OPTIONAL sections. The REQUIRED sections are exactly that—sections that you must implement in order to stay within the letter of the license.
There's only one limitation: if you are building a program which directly competes with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, or Access (the Microsoft applications with the new UI), you can't obtain the royalty-free license."