To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's reasonable in my view. All local BSD mount points (/usr, /home, /tmp, /var) go into one slice, so all together they only use up one disk 'partition'.
OTOH, if you want to separate /home, /usr and others on a Linux system you have to use up separate disk partitions. Linux must support extended partitions for practical reasons.
This only limits people who want to multi-boot more than 4 OSes on one disk. Those people will have to either buy another disk or use VMware or similar.
Exactly! BSD doesn't have to have a partition for each mount point, instead, you have one primary partition and then all your mount points become slices within.
I think the BSD way is a bit cleaner myself, but I have to admit it was confusing to me when I first encountered it.







Member since:
2006-04-21
I wonder why they've never made it possible to put it in an extended partition...having to take up a whole primary partition is a bit limiting, imo.