Linked by David Adams on Tue 26th Dec 2006 17:48 UTC
Windows An Economist.com editorial examines the OS lay of the land on the eve of Vista's release, and makes an interesting case for why Windows "rules the world". Do you agree? We report, you decide.
Thread beginning with comment 196313
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
longhorned
by sp29 on Tue 26th Dec 2006 19:56 UTC
sp29
Member since:
2006-01-04

Coming from a mac user who also has more pc's then macs. I don't see anything new in Vista compared to Mac OS X. Microsoft just borrowed a bunch of design from OS X. I mean it will be praised(Vista)in the Windows community, because I would image mult-millions of home users haven't seen OS X in action.

I'm amazed at the stupidity of MS engineers though. They are paid so well, but have to resort to copying Apple. That's quite a shame given the amount of time MS has been in business.

RE: longhorned
by rcsteiner on Tue 26th Dec 2006 22:13 in reply to "longhorned"
rcsteiner Member since:
2005-07-12

I'm amazed at the stupidity of MS engineers though. They are paid so well, but have to resort to copying Apple. That's quite a shame given the amount of time MS has been in business.

I suspect the problem isn't the engineers as much as it is the development environment and corporate culture in which they are forced to operate.

If new features must go through a smotheringly complex approval process, for example, the chances are good that you'll never see them in the end product regardless of their actual merit.

It only takes one short-sighted manager or team lead to kill a perfectly viable idea.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: longhorned
by Rayz on Wed 27th Dec 2006 09:35 in reply to "longhorned"
Rayz Member since:
2006-06-24

The Windows Presentation Foundation
The ability to use RAM drives as memory
Sideshow

.. that's three off the top of my head.

I'm amazed at the stupidity of MS engineers though. They are paid so well, but have to resort to copying Apple. That's quite a shame given the amount of time MS has been in business

Well, the difference is that MS engineers have to actually write operating systems; Apple engineers just have to keep bolting bits onto a UNIX clone they bought a few years ago, when their own efforts to develop an OS crashed and burned.

I'm often surprised when folk bang on about how long its taken MS to get Vista out the door, then forget to mention that Apple was trying to replace the original MacOS for TEN YEARS, before throwing in the towel and just buying an OS. Then we still had another couple of years to get it into a usable state.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1