To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's like waving a red flag to a bull
FTFA we get the following benchmarks (Edgy vs Feisty):
Unreal Tournament is slower: 24.46/24.30
GZIP is slower: 69.19/68.13
RAMSpeed is slower: 2840/2834 and 2818/2792
But hey, its more fun to insult original poster than actually looking at the coloured graphs you're referring to.
FTFA we get the following benchmarks (Edgy vs Feisty):
Unreal Tournament is slower: 24.46/24.30
That's a 0.65% difference. I would define it "noise". Do you agree?
GZIP is slower: 69.19/68.13
That's a 1.5% difference. Again, I would define it "noise"
RAMSpeed is slower: 2840/2834 and 2818/2792
0.77% and 1.4%.
So, it's hard for me to say whether this is just noise or the end results of using a beta version or the release that is getting 0.X% slower.






Member since:
2005-11-02
Zenja wrote:
It's interesting to notice how Linux got slower between the 2 releases.
RTFA:
it is also worth noting that at this time there are no real speed increases between Edgy Eft and Feisty Fawn; however, this was only the first Alpha (Herd) release of many to come before the April 2007 release of Ubuntu 7.04.
If you had bothered to look at the performance graphs (those funny looking pictures with bars and numbers) alone you would have seen there was overall virtually no difference in performance. Some tests ran a little faster on Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn Herd 1 than Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft and some a little slower.
I would appreciate it if you refrained from making ignorant and ill informed comments of limited veracity.
Edited 2006-12-30 01:07