Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jan 2007 23:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 199806
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: It's a good idea...
by archiesteel on Tue 9th Jan 2007 04:10
in reply to "RE[3]: It's a good idea..."
They don't need to take advantage of hidden APIs or protocols, just use APIs that are native to the Windows platform, like VSS.
Yes, that's the point I was making. This doesn't give MS a competitive advantage. Serving files and providing other network services can be done by a competitor using FOSS software.
RE[5]: It's a good idea...
by n4cer on Tue 9th Jan 2007 05:00
in reply to "RE[4]: It's a good idea..."
Yes, that's the point I was making. This doesn't give MS a competitive advantage. Serving files and providing other network services can be done by a competitor using FOSS software.
Functionality is only part of the solution. If they can't match usability and provide a packaged product that's easy to setup, and that people actually know is available, WHS still wins.
RE[5]: It's a good idea...
by Rayz on Tue 9th Jan 2007 10:50
in reply to "RE[4]: It's a good idea..."





Member since:
2005-07-06
As for making it work better with Windows than competitive product, this would mean that MS would take advantage of certain hidden protocols or APIs, which would open it wide to another anti-trust lawsuit. There's no reason why a Linux/BSD device with Samba couldn't do just as good a job (for cheaper in license fees).
They don't need to take advantage of hidden APIs or protocols, just use APIs that are native to the Windows platform, like VSS.