Linked by Anton Klotz on Thu 18th Jan 2007 18:16 UTC
This article tries to explain why workstations are no longer an appropriate tool for the present working environment, what the alternatives are, and what consequences it has for the development of OSes.
Thread beginning with comment 203236
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Flogging a stillborn horse
by arielb on Thu 18th Jan 2007 22:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Flogging a stillborn horse"
Member since:2006-11-15
RE[3]: Flogging a stillborn horse
by butters on Fri 19th Jan 2007 04:27
in reply to "RE[2]: Flogging a stillborn horse"
Member since:2005-07-08
IBM doesn't really have a viable UNIX workstation. They sacked their entire 3D graphics team a while ago. If you enjoy the vintage feel of CDE cerca 1996 I guess you'll be quite happy. If you don't, you'll probably prefer telnet, or even better, use the networking support in the hypervisor to let you directly access the system console over virtual serial.
RE[4]: Flogging a stillborn horse
by twenex on Fri 19th Jan 2007 05:12
in reply to "RE[3]: Flogging a stillborn horse"
Member since:2006-04-21
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-04-21
SGI is pretty much dead. anything else wasn't really a "workstation" but merely a unix pc.
Well, SCO boxes were "Unix PC's". Compare the state of Sun, DEC, DG, HP and IBM hardware in the 90s, and the software that was run on them, with the equivalent Amiga/Mac/PC offerings and I think you will agree HP, DEC, Sun, DG and IBM Unix boxen were "workstations" at the time.
And of course IBM and Sun Unix workstations are still around, as are HP-UX boxen if anyone wants them.