Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Jan 2007 16:53 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Thread beginning with comment 207435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-08
I think the important part here is that the Linux kernel community is providing options in a language that the hardware vendors can understand. They aren't making demands, they are making an offer that's hard to turn down.
They've effectively turned the issue on it's head. "We will supply kernel engineers to build your driver at no direct cost to you if you merely cooperate." Not "cooperate or we won't be able to make a driver."
Other than a formal statement expressing the kernel community's willingness to develop (open source) drivers with NDA specifications (which has been a prevailing sentiment for some time), there is nothing effectively new here. The kernel community has always been willing to develop drivers and maintain them in-tree with the rest of the kernel. But now they've restated their intentions in clear and direct language.
When put this way, it seems like an offer you can't refuse. For any hardware vendor that doesn't have a Linux driver, excuses have become nearly impossible to imagine. This statement makes the issue of Linux driver support (and continued maintenance thereof) an issue of dollars and cents. When the lawyers say to the CEO that they'd better avoid open source drivers to stay on the safe side of intellectual property law (because it's 100x easier for a lawyer to say no than yes), the CEO will look at the bottom line. Well, it won't cost us anything, so I say the heck with it, tell the bearded folks the specs are on the way.